WebGeary v Wetherspoon - G injured after sliding down banister in W pub - G sued W saying any D owning a pub knows people will be drinking so should tale precautions to stop people sliding down banister - W argued it was G's fault, she is responsible for her actions - Claim failed What was the law pre 1957? - Liability governed by common law WebGeary Act, an 1892 U.S. government law that restricted the rights of Chinese immigrants in the United States. Geary Boulevard, a major thoroughfare in San Francisco, California. …

tort - occupiers liability Flashcards Quizlet

WebWheat v Lacon- someone with sufficient degree of control over premises Furmedge- dividing responsibility. court determined occupier of travelling art installation was council and third party owner . 2)what is counted as a premises. s1(3) OLA 1957 any fixed or moveable structure includes temporary structures ... Geary v Wetherspoon- slid down ... WebMr. Michael Geary, (b. 1762), aged 31, Irish convict who was convicted in Cork, Ireland for 7 years for stealing, transported aboard the "Boddingtons" on 15th February 1793, arriving … bosch hood fan

Evaluation of occupiers liability Flashcards Quizlet

WebGeary v Wetherspoon beyond permission Wheaton v E Lacon a pub manager Haris v Biirkenstead council Wheeler v Copas a ladder is premises Gwilliam a splat wall Keown … WebJun 14, 2011 · On the evening of 29 March 2007, the claimant, Mrs Ruth Geary, had been drinking with some work colleagues at The Union Rooms, a pub in Newcastle City … WebGeary v Wetherspoon. the C's decision to slide was theirs- a duty is only owed if the state of the premises poses a real danger. Edwards v Sutton. C was pushing his bike across a bridge and fell off, the concept of "obvious dangers" was applied to the 1957 act and even though he was a lawful visitor- he was unable to claim compensation. bosch hoover accessories