WebAug 3, 2024 · The recent appeal decision in Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWCATAP 220 (Thomas and Naaz) brings medical practices and their service arrangements back under the microscope. The appeal was dismissed, with the Appeal Panel of the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal Appeal (NCAT) … WebMar 14, 2024 · Thomas and Naaz self-assessed their payroll tax position on the basis that the doctors were working in their own separate practices and were providing services to …

Payroll tax exposures for medical practices - Mazars - Australia

WebJan 20, 2024 · Discussions with the various State Revenue Offices and State Governments are ongoing. Thomas & Naaz is being appealed to the New South Wales Supreme Court of Appeal – while we won’t have an outcome until later in 2024, this will be a critical juncture as we finally get a binding Court decision applicable to general practice. WebMar 14, 2024 · Thomas and Naaz ‘got too many things wrong’. The AMA says the payroll tax loss leaves most practices vulnerable, but a tax expert says the details matter. The NSW Court of Appeal has dismissed the application by Thomas and Naaz to appeal the tribunal decision in their case, which left them liable for years’ worth of back-payroll tax. english literature paper 2018

Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue …

WebActivities and Societies: •Lead the college team as captain at a national event Effi-Cycle 2013. •Presented a paper on‘Maths and Sports’ at a National Conference. •Head of Marketing and Braking Department of college team for National GO-KART Championship 2013. •Directed a play and hosted various events at college festival FNORD 2013 ... WebSep 29, 2024 · A decision handed down on 3 September 2024 by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) in the case of Thomas and Naaz P/L v CCSR [2024] … WebJan 19, 2024 · Latest update. In July last year, the Appeals Panel of the New South Wales Civil & Administrative Tribunal (“the Panel”) decided against the taxpayer in the Thomas & Naaz appeal.In fact, the decision was somewhat of an anti-climax, with the Panel effectively concluding that the grounds of appeal were erroneous – the Panel can only decide on … dr eric swisher